Tuesday, March 8, 2016

SUMMER 2014: FROM THE SECTION PRESIDENT


Same-sex marriage is an issue that is both professionally and personally relevant to many of us. With the Windsor v. United States decision, the Supreme Court struck down parts of the federal Defense of Marriage Act and confirmed the right for states to recognize or prohibit same-sex unions. Right now, 21 states and the District of Columbia allow same-sex marriage, while 28 states prohibit it in their constitutions. Furthermore, some states (Arkansas, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Utah) are in limbo as they have issued marriage licenses to same-sex couples, which have now been put on hold until judicial challenges are resolved.
This patchwork system of recognition or denial of same-sex marriage has led to turbulence (to put it mildly!) for many same-sex couples. In my relationship with my partner, our Canadian marriage was recognized by our state of Wisconsin for one week. Scores of same-sex marriages were conducted in our state during this time. However, with the implementation of a judicial stay on the ruling allowing same-sex marriage in Wisconsin, marriage rights were immediately stripped for hundreds of same-sex couples. My partner and I joked that we were legally spouses on a recent trip to Minnesota, which recognizes same-sex marriages. However, when we crossed the border back into Wisconsin, we became legal strangers.
With many religious institutions performing same-sex unions, why is it important for same-sex marriages to have legal recognition by both state and federal governments? These reasons may be painfully obvious; most likely we can all recite the fact that over 1000 benefits are conferred with federally-recognized marriage. However, there are a myriad of other benefits of marriage that are not codified by law. For example, the work of psychologists Ellen Riggle, Sharon Rostosky, and Sharon Horne has documented that legally recognized same-sex couples experienced less psychological stress (e.g., internalized homophobia, depression) and greater well-being (e.g., meaning in life) than those whose partnership lacked legal standing. Thank you for reading this issue of Perspectives. I am excited about the work that our Section members have done and all we have yet to accomplish. Our research, teaching, and clinical work have us poised on the battlefield to fight for marriage rights. I am proud to be a member of Division 35, where psychologists are fighting to provide not only marriage equality, but social justice for all.

Julie A. Konik, PhD (Julie.Konik@uwc.edu).